Santanu Dhar Chowdhury v. State Of West Bengal

02.02.2022 Serial no.22 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 469 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 25.01.2022 in connection with All Women Kharagpur Police Station Case No. of dated 11.01.2022 under Sections 498A/323/307/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Santanu Dhar Chowdhury ... ...Petitioner Mr. Arindam Jana, Advocate Mr. Soumajit Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Samit Kr. Mandal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Amanul Islam, Advocate Mr. Arup Sarkar, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Consequently, CRM (A) 469 of 2022 is rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)