Sukanta Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal And ANR
18.2.2021 ks.
Ct. 42, sl.28 CRR 165 of 2021 Sukanta Chakraborty vs State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Pradyut Saha ... For Petitioner.
Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Mr. Dipankar Paramanick ... For the State.
This is for quashing of an impugned FIR registered on 13th May, 2018 at Belghoria P.S. Case No.336 of 2018 dated 13th May, 2018 under Section 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Pradyut Saha submits that the petitioner being an Ayurvedic Practitioner has been illegally involved in this case for the alleged holding of a Camp without obtaining required permission from the concerned Municipality and also for alleged taking of huge money from the people living nearby.
Mr. Saha contends that investigation is going on since May, 2018 and till then the fate of the investigation has not been made known to the petitioner causing serious prejudice to the petitioner. For such delayed investigation, the petitioner has proposed for quashing of the pending investigation. Mr. Sur, learned Advocate representing the State submits that in this case, investigation has already ended in charge-sheet making out a case under Section 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code against the accused person.
With the submission of the charge-sheet, the grievance expressed by the petitioner thus stands at bay requiring no
further address on such issue. When the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case, the point now raises in this case, may be raised at the time of consideration of the charge before the learned court below. The court is of the view that the purpose of the justice may be best sub-served by disposing of the revisional application with a direction mentioned hereinbelow. The petitioner is directed to take all such points now raises before the learned court below at the time of making consideration of charge, and all such points to be duly addressed by the learned court below in accordance with the provisions of law.
With this direction and observation, this revisional application stands disposed of.
Since charge-sheet has already been framed, learned court below is directed to supply copy of the same as expeditiously as possible.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)