← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/1850/2025dismissed

Nabanita Malik v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2025-03-05Hon'Ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya3 pages

4.

4.

05.03.2025 05.03.2025 Ct. No. 18 (ARPAN) W.P.A. 1850 of 2025 Nabanita Malik Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Susanta Kumar Gangopadhyay Mr. Arun Kumar Choudhury Ms. Subhasree Banerjee ...for the Petitioner Ms. Sharmila Datta Das Ms. Debarati Sen (Bose) ...for the State Mr. Sourav Mitra ...for W.B.C.S.S.C Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

Petitioner being an Assistant Teacher in a Government aided school has prayed for transfer in offline mode on medical ground since after an accident she had undergone an operation as a result whereof she is finding it difficult to attend the school from her place of residence by travelling long distance. Petitioner made offline applications dated 20th December, 2024 and 4th January, 2025 to the Headmistress of the school for her transfer but those applications are not made in a prescribed pro-forma.

It has been decided by the Hon'ble Division Bench vide order dated 14th February, 2025 on an intracourt appeal being FMA 103 of 2025 (Tanushri Karmakar v. State of West Bengal & Ors.) that the teacher seeking transfer is required to make application

in the prescribed pro-forma as provided in the relevant statute.

It has also been observed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in Tanushri Karmakar (supra) that once a thing is required to be done in a particular manner it should be done in such manner and not otherwise. The moment the form is prescribed in the rules shaping an integral part of the statutory provisions, it cannot be whittled down nor to be done away at the behest of the beneficiary of the said rules nor the other stakeholders of the said rules can dispense with the strict adherence of such statutory norms.

In absence of an application in the prescribed pro-forma and in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in Tanushri Karmakar (supra), no relief can be granted to the petitioner.

Hence, writ petition stands dismissed.

However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law for her transfer.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)