Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/269/2024dismissed as rejected

Sekh Mursid @ Murshed Alam And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-30Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi1 pages

30.01.2024 Serial no. 50 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd CRM (A) 269 of 2024 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Karandighi Police Station Case No. 124 of 2023 dated 08.03.2023 under Sections 448/341/323/325/326/307/379/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

(G.R. Case No 579. /2023 ) -AndIn the matter of : Sekh Mursid @ Murshed Alam & Ors. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Debapriya Mukherjee, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Debasish Roy, PP Mr. Navanil De, Advocates ... ...For the State Police are investigating a case of murder.

Eye-witness recording a statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code places all the petitioners before us at the time and place of occurrence.

Role of all the petitioners requires investigations. Enlarging any of the petitioners on anticipatory bail will be inimical to the investigations.

In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 269 of 2024 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)