Jahangir Islam Miyoti And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

03.02.2022 Serial no.20 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 499 of 2022 In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 27.01.2022 in connection with Berhampore Police Station Case No. 886 of 2021 dated 16.08.2021 under Sections 498A/325/307/379/376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act. -AndIn the matter of : Jahangir Islam Miyoti & Anr. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Jisan Iquabal Hossain, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Anand Keshari, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. He draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the first information report.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the de facto complainant.

The contents of the first information report is corroborated, at least on the prima facie level by the statement made by the de facto complainant under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as appearing from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Consequently, CRM (A) 499 of 2022 is rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)