← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/266/2024rejected

Jitu Mahato And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-30Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth1 pages

30.01.2024 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (DB) 266 of 2024 sl no. 42 In Re : An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baghmundi P.S. Case No. 23 of 2022 dated 16.3.2022 under sections 302/34 IPC And In Re : Jitu Mahato & Anr.

........ petitioners Mr. A Bhattacharyya Mr. S Ghosal ...... for the petitioners Ms. Z N Khan Mr. Asraf Mondal ...... for the State

1. Heard learned lawyers for the parties.

2. We have considered the materials on record. There are ample evidence connecting the petitioners with the crime. Trial has considerably progressed. 13 out of 18 witnesses have been examined. Keeping in mind the gravity of offence and the matured stage of trial, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.

3. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected.

4. Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)