Calcutta High CourtCPAN/11/1999dismissed for default

Urmila Halder & ORS. v. Dilip Chowdhury

2022-07-20Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

20.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 11 of 1999 Urmila Halder & Ors. Vs. Dilip Chowdhury In WPA 942 of 1995 Urmila Halder Vs.

The State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)