← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/536/2022dismissed

Bidyut Khanra v. State Of West Bengal

2022-02-08Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

08.02.2022 Serial no.10 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 536 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.01.2022 in connection with Khanakul P.S. Case No. 179 of 2021 dated 04.05.2021 under Sections 147/148/448/302/354(B)/427/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. -And- In the matter of : Bidyut Khanra ... ...Petitioner Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sompurna Chtterjee, Advocate ... For the Petitioner Mr. Anasuya Sinha, Advocate Mr. Pinak Kr. Mitra, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. He refers to the first information report. He submits that the incident arose out of a political rivalry. He submits that the police filed charge-sheet and, therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner are not required.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. He submits that the petitioner is named in the charge-sheet. The petitioner was absconding. He submits that there are statements recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure implicating the petitioner. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner as appearing from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

CRM (A) 536 of 2022 is rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)