← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/898/2021disposed

Raju Sah And Others v. State Of West Bengal

2021-04-16Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

CRM No.898 of 2021 (Via video conference) 16.04.21 (S.R.) Sl.258 Ct.28 In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Panrui Police Station Case No.91 of 2020 dated 07.10.2020 under Sections 143/144/506/186/332/353/307/308 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act (G.R. Case No.765 of 2020);

And In re: Raju Sah & Ors.

... petitioners.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Tirthapati Acharya Mr. Abdur Rakibg ... for the petitioners.

Mr. Subrata Ray ...for the State.

It has been submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State that there are no injuries, which can be seen from the injury report collected in course of investigation by the police authorities. However, he submits that the police authorities were obstructed from discharging their duties. The seizure has been effected in respect of remnants of the bombs, which were hurled.

Having regard to the nature of the allegations, we direct the petitioners to surrender before the learned jurisdictional court within a period of four weeks from date. The investigating officer shall not arrest the petitioners for a period of four weeks from date and the petitioners would meet with the investigating officer once a week on and from 19th April, 2021 till they appear or surrender before the jurisdictional court.

While considering the regular bail, the learned jurisdictional court shall take an independent view without being influenced by any observation made by this Court.

With the aforesaid observations, the application for anticipatory

bail, being CRM No.898 of 2021, is disposed of. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)