Calcutta High CourtCPAN/90/2001dismissed for default

Bhakti Kumar Dey v. Sudhangsu Sil

2022-12-05Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

05-12-2022 Item no.22 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.90 of 2001 Bhakti Kumar Dey -vsSudhangsu Sil & Ors.

arising out of WPA No.21879 of 1997 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on January 18, 2001, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated March 24, 1999 passed by this court in WP No.21879(W) of 1997.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]