Lalchand Sunar v. Mahipat Ram Agarwal

1.12.2021 sl. 20, ct.35 sk. C.R.A. 42 of 1991 ( Lalchand Sunar -vs- Mahipat Ram Agarwal ) None appears for the appellant.

None appears for the respondents.

It appears from the case record that despite issuance of several administrative notices to the parties and endeavours made by this court, none of the parties has shown any interest to proceed with the appeal. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22nd September, 1990 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling in C.R.Case No. 15 of 1988 under Sections 500/504 of the Indian Penal Code. By the judgment the learned Trial Judge acquitted the respondent of the complaint under Sections 500/504, Indian Penal Code. After reading the judgment of the court below minutely I find that the learned Trial Judge rendered the judgment on proper appreciation of the evidence both oral and documentary.

What I feel, the judgment of the learned trial court does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

As such, I find no reason or justification to interfere with the judgment.

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. The judgment dated 22nd September, 1990 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in C.R.Case No. 15 of 1988 is hereby confirmed.

Let a copy of this order along with the Lower Court records be sent down to the learned Court below. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on urgent basis.

(Rabindranath Samanta, J.)