Calcutta High CourtCPAN/113/2003dismissed for default

Md. Kashidur Rahaman v. Sachidananda Kandari

2022-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

29.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 113 of 2003 In WPA 4223 of 2000 ab Ct. 40 Md. Kashidur Rahaman Vs. Sachindananda Kandari No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)