← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/305/2026dismissed

Sekh @ Sk Farad @ Sekh Farad Ali v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-19Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

19.02.2026 Court No.35.

D/L. 52.

Kausik CRM (M) 305 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Pursurah Police Station Case No. 80 of 2021 dated 13.06.2021 under section 341/326/307/302/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Sekh @ Sk. Farad @ Sekh Farad Ali ......Petitioner.

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Pronay Basak Mr. Rajashree Tah Ms. Trisha Rakshit Ms. Aishwarya Datta Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty Ms. Sadia Parveen ......for the Petitioner.

Ms. Afreen Begum Mr. Dip Dutta ....for the Defacto.

Mr. Md. Adil Badr, Jr. Govt. Adv.

Ms. Nahid Ahmed ......for the State.

Earlier direction of this Court in CRM (M) 1690 of 2025 reflects that the prosecution was directed to examine at least 10 more witnesses within a period of 6 months. It has been informed that the evidence of the 2nd witness is in progress. The time period of another 2 months is still left. State would at least show that goodself prevail on them. Of late, I find that in some of the trial courts and obviously the prosecution, a habit has developed for ignoring

the orders of the High Court. I repeat that in each district the Superintendent of Police concerned are directed to abide by the orders of the High Court and not to invite any unnecessary unwarranted orders from this Court.

The other issue which has been canvassed by the petitioner is relating to his health. So far as the health issue is concerned, the concerned Superintendent/Deputy Superintendent of the Jail will seek advice of the medial officers of the jail. There are documents which have been enclosed regarding treatment of the petitioner. It would be the discretion of the concerned medical officer to advise the Deputy Superintendent or the Superintendent of Jail in respect of the health issues concerned.

With the aforesaid observations CRM(M) 305 of 2026 is disposed of.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)