← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/372/2026rejected

Arun Mandal v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-25Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta1 pages

25.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.27 ssi CRM (A) 372 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 2092 of 2025 dated 23.12.2025 under Sections 21 (C)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.

And In the matter of: Arun Mandal.

.... Petitioner Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ...for the petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Das Ms. Sukteya Ganguly ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the only material available against the present petitioner is the statement of the co-accused which is not admissible in evidence. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that other than the materials available in the case diary, there are as many as 11 criminal antecedents against the present petitioner, some pending under the provisions of the NDPS Act.

Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider that this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)