Calcutta High CourtCPAN/122/2001dismissed for default

Tapan Kumar Roy v. Prasanta Roy Chowdhury

2022-11-07Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

07-11-2022 Item no.11 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.122 of 2001 Tapan Kumar Roy -vsPrasanta Roy Chowdhury & Anr.

arising out of WPA No.10328 of 1999 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on January 25, 2001, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 5, 1999 passed by this court in WP No.10328(W) of 1999.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]