← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/398/2025rejected

Usman Ali Sekh v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-02-07Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Subhendu Samanta2 pages

07.02.2025 sdas Rejected C.R.M. (A) No. 398 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 224 of 2024 dated 27.12.2024 under Sections 329(4)/109/76/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS.

And In Re : Usman Ali Sekh ...... petitioner Mr. Asraf Mandal Mr. Tanbir Mandal .....for the petitioner Mr. Subhamoy Bhattacharya Ms. Sana Naaz ..... for the State Ms. Shalini Bairagi ..... for de facto complainant 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits there is delay in lodging FIR. Petitioner has been falsely implicate due to domestic quarrel. He prays for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits petitioner is son-in-law of one of the victims. He and his family members had trespassed into her house and assaulted her brutally. As a result Kohinoor's grand daughter also suffered injuries.

Kohinoor was hospitalized. This resulted delay in lodging FIR. 3.

We have considered the materials on record. In view of the primary role played by the petitioner in brutally assaulting Kohinoor resulting in life threatening injuries as well

as endangering her grand daughter's life we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him.

4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Subhendu Samanta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)