Arvind Kumar Singh v. State Of West Bengal

28.09.2021 sb CRR 257 of 2017 with CRAN 2 of 2019 (Old CRAN 14 of 2019) (Via video conference) In the matter of : Arvind Kumar Singh & Anr .....Petitioners Mr. Gopal Chandra Ghosh Ms. Debjani Sinha ....for the petitioners Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya...for the opposite party Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Saryati Dutta ...for the State Mr. Saryati Dutta, learned advocate appearing for the State has submitted the report of Officer-in-Charge, Ballygunge G.R.P.S. The report reflects that after completion of investigation of the case, final report as mistake of fact, has been submitted. Let the report be kept with the record.

Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing for the opposite party is present. The petitioner is also represented by his learned advocate.

The revisional application was preferred for quashing of Ballygunge G.R.P.S case no. 48 of 2016.

Having regard to the present stage of the case, there is no scope of interference by this Court.

The opposite party no. 2 would be at liberty to take appropriate steps before the jurisdictional court in accordance with the provisions of Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if so advised.

With the aforesaid observation, the revisional application being CRR 257 of 2017 is disposed of.

Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)