Pronoy Kumar Roy v. State Of West Bengal

12.07.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.24 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc.

C.R.R. 243 of 2012 (Via Video Conference) Pronoy Kumar Roy versus The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Sandip Chakraborty ... For the State.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner or the State. As such, Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate who ordinarily appears for the State is directed to appear in this matter. The present revisional application has been preferred challenging the continuance of the proceedings relating to Mahishadal P.S. Case No. 313 of 2011 dated 14.12.2011 under Sections 3/4/5/6/7/9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1447 of 2011).

Records reflect that the revisional application appeared on 18.04.2012 and a co-ordinate Bench of this Court refused to grant any interim order. The main plea of the petitioner is that the petitioner is not the owner of the hotel (Monihar) and some other person happens to be the owner and the said owner was in custody in connection with another case, viz. Mahishadal P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010 dated 20.02.2010.

The contentions so advanced by the petitioner are issues of fact which cannot be enquired into by this Court. As such, this Court is not inclined to interfere with such contentions advanced by the petitioner. Further, this Court has not been apprised regarding the present stage of the proceedings after almost ten years. Having regard to the same, this Court is of the view that the revisional application has no merit and as such, CRR 243 of 2012 is dismissed. All pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)