← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/444/2026rejected

Rakesh Sikdar v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-18Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

AD 70 February 18, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 444 of 2026 Reject An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Palashipara P.S. Case No.152 of 2023 dated 17.05.2023 under Sections 363/366/34 of the IPC.

And In the matter of: Rakesh Sikdar ... petitioner Mr. Manas Kumar Das Mr. Asraf Mandal Mr. Prabal Das ... for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Ray Ms. Nahid Ahmed ... for the State Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and relies on the statement of the minor victim who was recovered by the police in which she has stated that the petitioner had kidnapped her. Reliance is also placed on other statements.

Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. [ (Jay Sengupta, J.)