Montey Shah & ANR. v. State

21.9 Ct. No. 26 & akb C.R.R. 30 of 2006 With C.R.R. 251 of 2006 (Via Video Conference) In the matter of : Ajit Shah ....Petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Das ...for the State These revisional applications have been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners in both the revisional applications. No accommodation has been prayed for. When these matters were called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

Accordingly, the revisional applications are dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.

The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.

The lower Court is directed to act expeditiously in accordance with law.

( Shekhar B. Saraf, J. )