Abdulla Jamadar @ Jamader v. State Of West Bengal

23.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.50 ssi CRM (A) 456 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Bakultala Police Station Case No.435 of 2023 dated 29.11.2023 under Sections 498A/325/328/307/506/34/304B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. And In the matter of: Abdulla Jamadar @ Jamader.

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Sourav Mondal Mr. Chandra Nath Sarkar Mr. Abhirup Haldar ...for the petitioner Mr. Prakash Bhattacharya Md. Ejaj Akhter ..for the State Leave is granted to amend the cause title.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is the father of the alleged victim. The husband was arrested and was thereafter granted bail. Others were granted anticipatory bail. Charge sheet has been submitted. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the post mortem report, the chemical report regarding poison and the statements of other witnesses. However, the statements of some of the neighbours show that after the incident, the in-laws had taken her to the doctor. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that the principal accused being the husband was arrested and thereafter granted bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date and shall attend the jurisdictional Court regularly. The petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)