Calcutta High CourtCPAN/235/2003dismissed for default

Prosad Ghosh Dastidar v. Chandra Sekhar Sasmal

2022-09-30Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

30-09-2022 Item no.12 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.235 of 2003 Prosad Ghose Dostidar -vsShri Chandra Sekhar Sasmal & Ors.

arising out of WPA No.3664 of 2001 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on January 29, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated December 14, 2001 passed by this court in WP No.3664(W) of 2001. It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]