← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/448/2025rejected

Bakibillaha Sardar @ Baki Billa @ Baki v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-02-11Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

11.02.2025 sdas Rejected C.R.M. (A) No. 448 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Basirhat Police Station Case No. 807 of 2023 dated 30.11.2023 under Section 20(B)(ii)(b) of the NDPS Act read with Sections 188/353/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Bakibillaha Sardar @ Baki Billa @ Baki Sardar ...... petitioner Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury Ms. Chandrima Debnath .....for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Biswas Mr. Raju Mondal ..... for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits in 2019 he was falsely implicated in a case involving narcotics. He has been granted pre-arrest bail. Subsequently he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He prays for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits petitioner has criminal antecedents. He was implicated in a narcotics case earlier. In the present case he and his associates were involved in illegal transportation of narcotics across international border. When BSF personnel intervened they ran away.

3.

We have considered the materials on record.

Petitioner was involved in a narcotics case earlier. In the present case it is alleged he was transporting narcotics across international border. He had absconded. His custodial

interrogation may reveal ramifications of the crime and hence this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner

4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)