Priti Mittal & ORS. v. Anup Kumar Agarwal

29.08.

CRR 290 of 2017 Ct Priti Mittal & Ors.

Versus

Anup Kumar Agarwal rup From the record, it appears that the matter is pending since 2017 and by the order dated 31.01.2017 petitioners were directed to serve notice upon the opposite party. But neither the order of service of notice was complied with by filing affidavit of service, nor anyone present on behalf of the petitioners after the order dated 31.01.2017.

It appears that petitioners are not willing to proceed with this case further.

Thus, the reviaional application stands dismissed for default.

Connected application, if any, stands dismissed. Interim order, if there be any, also stands vacated. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)