Sk. Akbar Ali And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

22.03.2022 Serial no.100 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 832 of 2022 In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 15.02.2022 in connection with Rajarhat P.S. Case No. 329 of 2021 dated 15.11.2021 under Sections 406/420/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Sk. Akbar Ali & Anr.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Jayanta Das, Advocate Mr. Hemanta Kr. Das, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. APP Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya, Advocate ... ... For the State Mr. Golam Mastafa, Advocate Mr. S. Sardar, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the statement of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The de facto complainant is represented.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

CRM (A) 832 of 2022 is rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)