Suprakash Chattopadhyay @ Suprakash Chatterjee v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

20.02.2025 W.P.A. 3072 of 2025 Item No.84 Ct. No.35 dc.

Suprakash Chattopadhyay @ Suprakash Chatterjee versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Atis Kumar Biswas, Mr. Abhijit Singha Roy ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Rajarshi Basu, Mr. Ananda Dulal Sarkar ... For the State.

Mr. Dip Jyoti Chakraborty, Ms. Dona Saha ... For the Respondent No. 5.

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept with the record.

Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be also kept with the record. A copy of the report be handed over to the learned advocates appearing for the petitioner and the respondent no.5.

The petitioner complains that he has been implicated in connection with Kumarganj P.S. Case No. 117/2024 dated 30.04.2024 under Sections 420/468 of the Indian Penal Code. After the petitioner was granted bail, the complainant who is an influential person is causing inconveniences and thereby trying to put the life of the petitioner at peril. The petitioner prays for police protection. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent no.5 submits that he has already applied for cancellation of bail which although was initially rejected, but against the said order, a fresh

application for cancellation of bail has been preferred before the learned Sessions Judge.

According to the respondent no.5, the petitioner is creating a circumstance for sympathy so that he can get an escape route in the present application for cancellation of bail pending before the learned Sessions Judge.

State has submitted a report. The same is to the extent that investigation of the case is in progress. Report also reflects that there has been collection of some materials.

In view of the nature of the prayer sought for in the present writ petition, I am of the opinion that since it has been claimed that the petitioner is an aged person, if he approaches the police station with prayers in respect of inconveniences caused from any corners, the police authorities would assess regarding any reason of insecurity and render appropriate assistance, if required.

As no affidavits have been called for, the accusations made against the private respondent and/or the State-respondents are deemed not to have been admitted.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition being WPA 3072 of 2025 is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)