← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/1296/2021dismissed as withdrawn

Atarul Mallick@Atai Mallick v. State Of West Bengal

2021-10-01Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta1 pages

7.

C.R.M. 1296 of 2021 01-10-2021 (Via Video Conference) sg Court 30 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Atarul Mallick @ Atai Mollick

Versus

State of West Bengal Mr. Atis Kumar Biswas, Adv.

Mr. Amit Singh, Adv.

...for the petitioner Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Adv.

...for the State The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner is not willing to press this application. The learned Counsel for the State, however, submits that the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal directly implicates the petitioner.

In view of the fact that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with this application, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall no order as to costs.

(Rabindranath Samanta, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)