Aminuddin Dhali @ Amin Uddin Dhali And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

26.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.41 ssi CRM (A) 511 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Bakultala Police Station Case No.473 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024 under Sections 103 (1)/351(2)/61(2) of the BNS 2023. And In the matter of: Aminuddin Dhali @ Amin Uddin Dhali & others. .... Petitioners.

Mr. Bapin Baidya ...for the petitioners Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Ms. Rajashree Tah ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the parents of the principal accused. A four years old child was found dead in a pond. The FIR was registered after two months. The principal accused, being the daughter of the petitioners, is in custody. The FIR only spoke about a suspicion that the principal accused had committed such offence in conspiracy with the present petitioners.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the post mortem report and the statements of witnesses.

Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the alleged roles ascribed to the present petitioners and the fact that the principal accused is in custody in connection with the instant case and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioners shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date and shall attend the jurisdictional Court regularly. The petitioners shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)