Tanuja Chowdhury v. S.K. Narula

Ct.No.1 D/L 09.04.2026 Saikat Mukherjee CPAN/251/2003 TANUJA CHOWDHURY VS.

S.K. NARULA Mr. Swapan Kr. Datta, G.P.

Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Adv.

...For the Respondent-State Dictated by Partha Sarathi Sen, J.

1. None for the applicant/petitioner.

2. Respondent-State is represented.

3. It is a matter of 2003. We have every reason to believe that the petitioner has lost his interest in proceeding with the instant matter and/or the matter becomes infructuous on account of passage of time.

4. In view of such, the instant contempt application is dismissed for default.

(SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)