Milan Ghosh & ORS v. State Of West Bengal

16.03.2023 Sl. No.: 38 Court No.30 BM CRR 433 of 2020 Milan Ghosh & Ors.

Vs.

State of West Bengal Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee Ms. Oindrila Ghosh ... for the petitioners Ms. Puspita Saha ... for the State Learned counsel for the petitioners is present. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that warrant of proclamation and attachment issued by the trial court has now become infructuous as the petitioners have surrendered before the trial court. The case relates to Kalna Police Station No.963 of 2019 under Section 302/34 of the IPC.

Ms. Puspita Saha, learned counsel for the State present in court is appointed to represent the State in this case. Let her appointment be regularised. Accordingly, the criminal revision is disposed of being infructuous All connected application stands disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance and to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this case to the concerned authority.

( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )