← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/314/2017dismissed for default

Debosmita Gayen Nee Guin v. Rudra Prasad Gayen

2023-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

29.08.

CRR 314 of 2017 Ct Smt. Debosmita Gayen nee Guin

Versus

Sri Rudra Prasad Gayen rup Mr. Debajyoti Deb, Mr. Shyamal Mondal Ms. Somdyut Parekh ... for the O.P.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite party is present in response to administrative notice.

From the report of the department it is found that administrative notice was served upon the petitioner. But none appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. The instant revisional application stands dismissed for default.

Connected application, if there be any, stands dismissed.

Interim order, if there be any, also stands vacated. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)