Lalita Shri @ Lalita Shri Murty v. Amit Banerjee
26.02.2021 (S/L-05) Ct.-18 (Susanta) (Via Video Conference) C.O. 440 of 2020 Smt. Lalita Shri @ Lalita Shri Murty -Vs- Amit Banerjee Mr. Debajyoti Basu, Mr. Swapan Chakraborty, Mr. Jyoti Prakash Khan, ...... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Abhijit Roy, .... For the Opposite Party.
Mr.
Debajyoti Basu, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client proposed to amend the plaint to include a prayer for a decree of arrear license fees and in view of that does not want to press this application.
Be that as it may, the petitioner does not want to press this revisional application.
C.O. 440 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Biswajit Basu, J.)