Shyamal Kumar Chattopadhyaya v. Aparna Moulik

CPAN 108 of 2013 In WPA 22159 of 2011 04.11.2022 Ct.15 03.

BD Shyamal Kumar Chattopadhyaya -vsAparna Moulik Mr. Anil Kumar Chattopadhyay ... for the applicant.

Mr. Arijit Dey ... for the alleged contemnor.

When the contempt application is taken up for consideration Mr.

Chattopadhyay, learned advocate appears on behalf of the applicant and submits that the contempt application has become infructuous. Sole alleged contemnor is represented by learned advocate.

In view of such submission being made by the applicant the contempt application stands dismissed as infructuous.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)