Aditya Bera @ Babusona Bera @ Babu Sona And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

27.03.2026 Court No.35.

D/L. 95.

Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 444 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 420 of 2025 dated May 27, 2025 under Sections 329(1)/117(2)/109/103/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Aditya Bera @ Babusona Bera @ Babu Sona & Anr.

......Petitioners.

Mr. Navanil De Mr. Subhrajit Dey ......for the Petitioners.

Mr. Iqbal Kabir Mr. Karan Bapuli ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for 10 months, charges have been framed and witness action has commenced. It has been submitted that the genesis of the case is property dispute between the uncle and the nephew.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail, produces the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS. On an assessment of the facts of the case, I find that the deadly weapon involved in the case is a stick. Considering the fact that there is no antecedents of similar nature so far as

the present petitioners are concerned and the prosecution has relied upon 17 witnesses to prove its case, which will take some time, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioners namely, (1) Aditya Bera @ Babusona Bera @ Babu Sona, (2) Sudipta Kumar Bera @ Sudipta Kr. Bera @ Raju Bera @ Raju shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Tamluk at Purba Midnapore.

If on bail, the petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Purba Midnapore without the prior permission of the Learned Trial Court. Additionally, it is directed that petitioners shall not enter the jurisdiction of Tamluk Police Station till the learned Trial Court finds that the necessary witnesses within the said jurisdiction who are not associated with the government departments are examined in full.

With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 444 of 2026 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)