Calcutta High CourtCPAN/297/2000dismissed for default

Sk.Khariul Alam v. Pritish Kumar Pathak

2022-11-30Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

30-11-2022 Item no.26 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.297 of 2000 Sk. Khariul Alam -vsMr. Pritish Kumar Pathak arising out of WPA No.8414 of 1998 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on February 14, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated August 1, 1998 passed by this court in WP No.8414(W) of 1998.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]