Nazia Hasan v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

24/06 In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction AD/45/24 Appellate Side 266312 WPA/3331/2024 NANDY (DO) NAZIA HASAN VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Pritha Biswas, Advocate Ms. Upasana Sarkar, Advocate ......for the Petitioner Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Advocate ......for SSC Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr. Bibek Dutta, Advocate Mr. Manas Bhattacharyya, Advocate ......for the WBBSE Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, Advocate Ms. Mary Datta, Advocate ......for the State

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. In spite of service, the School Authority is not represented.

3. The petitioner's application for transfer on self-medical ground had been rejected sometime in 2022. Such rejection had been challenged. However, the medical disability of the petitioner has subsequently been cured and is not available to her as a ground for transfer.

4. The petitioner seeks liberty to file an application for transfer on the general ground of distance.

5. The petitioner is at liberty to file such application, if so advised.

6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 2