← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/937/2022allowed

Samrat Sahanur Khan @ Samrat Khan And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-02-28Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

28.02.2022 Serial no. 05 Dd CRM (A) 937 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Arambagh Police Station Case No. 310 of 2020 dated 14.08.2020 under Sections 341 / 323/ 326/ 307/ 448/ 427/379/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal read with Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Samrat Sahanur Khan @ Samrat Khan & Ors. ... Petitioners Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta, APP Mr. Subrato Roy, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. There is a previous police case being Arambagh Police Station Case no. 295 of 2020 dated August 7, 2020 in respect of an incident of August 6, 2020. He submits that police case being no. 295 of 2020 relates to a murder. Two of the accuseds in such murder case caused the de facto complainant to lodge the present police case in respect of the same incident on August 6, 2020, falsely implicating the petitioners therein. He submits that the police filed charge sheet in the present case. Therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required.

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that petitioners are with notorious antecedents. He refers to the contents in the case diary including the injury report. There was an incident of August 6, 2020 in respect of which the police lodged a compliant bearing no. 295 of 2020 dated August 7, 2020. The present police complaint is in relation to the same incident of August 6, 2020 and significantly lodged on August 14, 2020. The possibility of the petitioners herein being falsely implicated as a counterblast with the earlier police case cannot be wholly ruled out. Moreover, police filed charge sheet.

In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on every date fixed for hearing. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

CRM (A) 937 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)