Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/953/2022allowed

Noor Alam Sekh And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-02-25Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

CRM (A) 953 of 2022 25.02.2022 Sl. 17 Court No.29 Suvayan (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Margram P.S. Case No. 34/2022 dated 08/02/2022 under Sections 448/341/323/325/379/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Noor Alam Sekh & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha ...for the petitioners.

Ms. Anasuya Sinha Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary.

Considering the fact that there are previous police complaints lodged at the instance of the petitioner No.1 and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner No.1 (Noor Alam Sekh) and petitioner No.2 (Rafikul Sekh) shall meet before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and the petitioner No.3 (Champa Bibi), petitioner No.4 (Rakiba Bibi), petitioner No.5 (Moumita Bibi alias Momita Bibi) and petitioner No.6 (Hafiza Bibi alias Dhameli Bibi) shall cooperate with the

investigation and that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

CRM (A) 953 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)