Rabindra Narayan Kundu v. Arabinda Das And ANR

08.03.2022 Ct. 21 D/L 134 ab C.O. 380 of 2022 Rabindra Narayan Kundu -VsArabinda Das & Anr.

Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Ms. S. Chatterjee, Ms. D. Ganguly, Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, ... for the petitioner Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, learned advocate appears for the petitioner.

Record shows that the notice of this application has not been served on the opposite parties.

The petitioner by filing the present application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for expeditious disposal of ARC Case No. 147/08 (ARC Case No. 147/17/08), pending before the learned Additional Rent Controller, Kolkata.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the learned Court below has been granting unnecessary adjournments and due to which, there is a delay in disposal of the case and such delay is causing hardship to the petitioner.

Having regard to the nature of relief claimed by the petitioner, being a prayer for expeditious disposal of the ARC Case No. 147/08 (ARC Case No. 147/17/08), I do not find any need to serve notice of the present application on the opposite parties and it is not likely to cause any prejudice to the interest of the opposite

parties. Therefore, service of notice upon the opposite parties is dispensed with.

The learned Additional Rent Controller, Kolkata is requested to dispose of ARC Case No. 147/08 (ARC Case No. 147/17/08), as expeditiously as possible and positively within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order, without granting any adjournment whatsoever to any of the parties. Accordingly, the revisional application being C.O. 380 of 2022 is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities.

( Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)