Pramod Kumar Agarwal v. Leela Krishna Traders & ORS.

CRR 253 of 2016 Court No. 33 Item 38 sk 27.06.2022 In the matter of:- Pramod Kr. Agarwal ........ Petitioner.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. No accommodation has been sought for.

It appears that on several dates, the petitioner was directed to complete service on notice upon the opposite parties and affidavit of service, but the petitioner did not comply the order.

Accordingly, the present revisional application is dismissed for default.

The interim order, if any, stands vacated.

All connected applications stands disposed of. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)