Sk. Ali @ Sk. Rahamat Ali @ Sekh Rahamat Ali v. The State Of West Bengal

19.02.2025 Sl. No.20 akd [Rejected] C. R. M. (A) 560 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 12.02.2025 in connection with Memari Police Station Case No.971 of 2024 dated 09.12.2024 under Sections 318(4)/316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (G.R. Case No.6295 of 2024) And In Re: Sk. Ali @ Sk. Rahamat Ali @ Sekh Rahamat Ali ... ... Petitioner Mr. Kunal Ganguly ... ... for the petitioner Ms. Nahid Ahmed ... ... for the State 1.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in no way connected with the vehicle which has been let out to co-accused viz. Md. Kiran Islam. Accordingly, he prays for anticipatory bail. 2.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits petitioner and said Md. Kiran Islam had broken down parts of the vehicle and sold them. 3.

We have considered the materials on record. De-facto complainant had let out the vehicle to one Md. Kiran Islam on hire. It is alleged said Md. Kiran Islam and the petitioner had broken down the vehicle and sold it in parts. Hence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him.

4.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)