Suraj Choudhury v. Superintendent, Anti Evasion Dept.

02.12.2021.

p.b.

Sl. No.34.

W.P.A. 4157 of 2021 (Through Video Conference) Suraj Choudhury Vs.

The Superintendent & Ors.

Ms. Amrita Pandey, Ms. Monideepta Banerjee.

..........for the petitioner.

Mr. B. P. Banerjee, Mr. Tapan Bhanja.

.........for the respondents.

In this matter, petitioner has challenged the impugned order of provisional attachment of bank account of the petitioner in question.

Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the respondents files instruction/report received from the respondents authority being Superintendent, Hdqrs. AntiEvasion Unit (GR.D) Howrah CGST & CX from which it appears that the conduct of the petitioner is not clean and the business he claims to carry is all bogus and petitioner claims for Input Tax Credit is bogus which has appeared by preliminary investigation by the investigating wing of the department. Let such instruction dated 30th November, 2021 filed by Mr. Banerjee be kept with the record. Considering the facts as discussed above and taking into consideration, the contents of the said instruction/

report dated 30th November, 2021, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly this writ petition being WPA No.4157 of 2021 is dismissed. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)