Jemima Sultana And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

06.04.

Ct. No. 24 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE.

WPA 3727 of 2026 Ab Jemima Sultana and others Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others.

--------------- Mr. Jagobandhu Roy, Ms. Salma Sultana.

... for the petitioners.

Mr. Martanda Pratap Chakraborty, Mr. Ejaz Hossain.

... for the State.

Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Ms. Pramiti Bandopadhyay, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh.

... for the WBCSSC.

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. The petitioners' grievance is that the petitioners' answer was akin to the preliminary answer key as published but not with the final answer key.

3. The petitioners have made a representation, which is pending consideration.

Though such representation is not part of the petition.

4. Ms. Bandopadhyay, learned Advocate appearing for the Commission, in her usual fairness has submitted that the respondent no. 5 will consider the representation.

5. Let the respondent no.

consider the

representation of the petitioners and dispose of the same by May 15, 2026. The resultant order will be communicated to the petitioners by May 30, 2026.

6. With the afore-stated direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)