Bapparaj Dey @ Bappa Dey v. State Of West Bengal

02.03.2022 Serial no. 16 Dd CRM (A) 1029 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nabadwip Police Station Case No. 409 of 2020 dated 13.10.2020 under Sections 448/325/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Bapparaj Dey @ Bappa Dey ... Petitioner Mr. Brajesh Jha, Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Mr. Saket Sharma, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Mr. Suman De, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. There are criminal antecedents so far as the de facto complainant is concerned. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein and considering the fact that police filed charge sheet, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on every date fixed for hearing.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

CRM (A) 1029 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)