Dola Roy v. State Of West Bengal

02.03.2022 Serial no. 24 Dd CRM (A) 1037 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pandua Police Station Case No. 41 of 2022 dated 23.01.2022 under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code(G.R. No. 188 of 2022) -AndIn the matter of : Dola Roy ... ...Petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Mr. Argha Das, Mr. Abhishek Bose, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Mr. Bitasok Banerji, Advocates ... ...For the State Mr. Sujan Chatterjee, advocate ... ...For the de facto complainant Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary. He submits that there was an agreement between the de facto complainant, the petitioner and the co-accused with regard to an immovable property by virtue of which, the other coaccused and the petitioner received consideration from the de facto complainant. The co-accused and the petitioner who are husband and the wife in relation did not execute the title deed nor refunded the amount received from the de facto complainant in respect thereof.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

CRM (A) 1037 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)