Calcutta High CourtCO/446/2017dismissed for default

Sachin Kumar Pramanik @ Sachin Kr Pramanik & ORS v. Dinu Pramanik & ORS

2024-02-07Hon'Ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury2 pages

In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side 30.03.2026 Item No.1 Ali ct. no.9 C.O. 446 of 2017 With IA No.:CAN/1/2025 Sachin Kumar Pramanik @ Sachin Kr. Pramanik & Ors.

Vs.

Dinu Pramanik & Ors.

Mr. Bisworup Biswas, Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh ...... for the petitioners.

1. Learned advocate for the petitioners is present.

2. The application for restoration being CAN 1 of 2025 is taken up for consideration.

3. Heard learned advocate. Perused the petition filed.

4. Upon hearing the learned advocate for the petitioners and upon perusing the petition filed, this Court is of the view that the petitioners have been able to show sufficient ground for not being present on the date fixed on 07.02.2024, as well as ground for delay in filing this application for restoration. Thus, the delay in filing this application is condoned. The order dated 07.02.2024 passed in C.O. 446 of 2017 is recalled and C.O. 446 of 2017 restored to its original file and number.

5. The application being CAN 1 of 2025 is disposed of.

6. Let this matter appear after two weeks under the heading "Civil Revision".

(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)