Pallab Hazra v. Nripen Chandra Bera

21.04.2022 Item No.7 Ct. No.7 CHC (disposed of) C.O.428 of 2022 (Physical Hearing) Sri Pallab Hazra Vs.

Sri Nripen Chandra Bera Mr. Animesh Paul ...for the petitioner Learned advocate appearing of the petitioner is fair enough to submit that though the petitioner has challenged the order dated 17th February, 2022, permitting repairing to be undertaken by the defendant in aid of an application under Section 151 C.P.C., but in the meantime, the repairing work having already been concluded, he is not pressing the same. He simply proposes for a direction upon the court below to ensure expeditious disposal of the pending suit. While proposing for expeditious disposal of the suit, it is submitted by the petitioner that there is no interlocutory application pending.

In view of the nature of order proposed to be made, no prior notice is considered to be necessary. Service upon the opposite party is thus dispensed with. Accordingly, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 7th Court, at Howrah in Title Suit No.253 of 2020, is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of suit, after

causing disposal of interlocutory application, if there be any pending, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and opposite party.

With this observation/directions, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities. (Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)