← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/3892/2025dismissed as not pressed

Piku Sil And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-09-17Hon'Ble Justice Aniruddha Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE 10-11 17.9.2025 Sc Ct. no.2 WPA 16956 OF 2025 ------------- Smt. Maya Sarkar Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

With WPA 3892 OF 2025 ------------- Smt. Piku Sil & Anr.

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

M Mr. Jagadish Chandra Halder Mr. Gourab Ghosh.

....For the Petitioner in WPA 16956 of 2025 Mr. Sukhendu Bikash Mukherjee ....For the Petitioners in WPA 3892 of 2025 Mr. Saptansu Basu, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena.

....For the Respondent No.2 in WPA 3892 of 2025 Mr. Kallol Basu Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena.

....For the Respondent No. 2 in WPA 16956 of 2025 Mr. Kalidas Saha ....For the Respondent No.1 in WPA 3892 of 2025 Re : WPA 16956 of 2025 -------- On the prayer of Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no.2, Port Trust Authority time to file report in the form of affidavit stands

extended till today. The report, filed in Court today, is taken on record. Copy has been served upon Mr. Gourab Ghosh, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner led by Mr. Jagadish Chandra Halder, learned Advocate. The petitioner shall file exception in the form of affidavit to the report on or before November 18, 2025. This writ petition shall appear under the heading "Motion (Service)" on November 20, 2025.

Re : WPA 3892 of 2025 ------------ Mr. Sukhendu Bikash Mondal, learned Advocate appears for the petitioners.

Mr. Saptansu Basu, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena, learned Advocate appears for the Port Trust Authority, respondent no.2.

Mr. Kalidas Saha, learned Advocate appears for the respondent no.1.

MMr. Sukhendu Bikash Mondal, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, he has filed Vokalatnama on behalf of the petitioners. He has placed instruction in the form of a letter dated September 2, 2025, received from his clients, the same is taken on record.

In view of the content appearing from the said written instruction, he prays for dismissal of this writ petition as not pressed.

Accordingly, this writ petition, WPA 3892 of 2025 stands dismissed as not pressed, without any order as to costs.

Photocopy of this order be kept with the records of each of the writ petitions.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)