Sajal Baidya v. State Of West Bengal

02.03.2022 Serial no. 29 Dd CRM (A) 1068 of 2022 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Santipur Police Station Case No. 1083 of 2021 dated December 29, 2021 under Sections 447/323/325/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Sajal Baidya & Ors. ... Petitioners Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioners Ms. Zaren N. Khan, Md. Kutubuddin, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that there is a counter case between the private parties. Petitioner no. 1 also sustained injury. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein and considering the fact that there is a counter case, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till completion of investigation. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

CRM (A) 1068 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)