Calcutta High CourtCPAN/386/2000dismissed for default

Sudha Ghosh v. Tarini Mal

2022-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

29.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 386 of 2000 in WPA 8105 of 1996 Sudha Ghosh Vs. Tarini Mal ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)